Criteria | Score 1 - 10 | Comments |
Equity before the law Fairness Impartiality Independence Respect for the law Accessibility Competence Integrity Accountability Efficiency Client Satisfaction Transparency | 4 3 1 6 1 8 5 2 3 4 5 4 | All tenants are treated equally bad All landlords are treated with some fairness Gross discrimination against tenants No authority to impose penalties as specified in the Act Tenants’ evidence is viewed as irrelevant; law ignored Inexpensive with usually few delays Ignorance of New Act months after it came into effect Deliberate misleading of the public on services provided Self-assessment of performance; self-reporting Routine refusal to approve re-hearings ensures quick results Landlords very content; tenants very submissive Refusal to provide statistics; refusal to answer queries; and hearings closed to media , visitors or members of the public |
12 Criteria | 46/120 38% Fail | Overall comments: · Tribunal should refer to the law occasional · Tribunal should sometimes look at the evidence · Tribunal should have power to issue fines as stated in Act · Tribunal should follow set procedures consistently · Procedural fairness should be factored into the process · Justice should be more important than paper shuffling · Reporting should show all raw data on decisions made · Hearings should be open to external scrutiny |
Assessment performed by ‘In Justices Australia’
1 comment:
CTTT CORRUPTION HAS CAUSED ME A CENTRLINK PESIONER TO BE A BANKRUPT JUST FOR USING THEIR SERVICE.
The CTTT is the most corrupt inept disgusting abuse of the average citizen and should be stripped of their powers.
They are dangerous a kangeroo court and reminiscent of dictatorship memtality.
They have more power than an Australian court as they do not have to consider evidence but can cross the floor to make descissions as if they are in the courts.
The members do not have to any legitimate credentials to make serious descisions over peoples lives.
When attempting an appeal any dogs body in the tribunal office can make the descision to refuse appeals.
Members state I can do what ever I like and do, they have a get out of jail free card for every descision they maKe so are not culprable to anyone and thus do just make descisions according to personal preference.
Actual facts that occurred throughout the case were not only ignored when making final descisions they were totally mistold in fact lies made by members heard again on cttt cd
The complaint I put to the CTTT involved a unmerchantable Jayco motoerhome worth over $100,000.
I took it to CTTT in Tamworth.
I suffered two years of Members abusing me verbally and discrimitating against and generally treating me as if I were in the wrong for even thinking about going to cttt all on cd recording.
I purchased it from Watsons Coffs Harbour and named them in the application only but
Importers of the fiat component, manufacturers Jayco and sellers Watsons were all included.
Yet when I requested the correct person to be at tribunal it was ok according to members to have another two persons who either knew nothing of the motoRHOME or caused this cttt action,
RESPONDENTS LIED AND DEFAMED ME ON PAPER TO THE CTTT, THE CTTT DID NOTHING'
yET MEMBER 'PICKED ON ME LITERALLY
Lawyers were included even though i was unable to afford one and told by the member "I have a motorhome so I am not without means" although I am a centrelink pensioner again heard on cttt cd.
For two telephone appearances Lawyeres were allowed to be included.
Although I appealed this it meant at the final hearing of course these costs were allowed to be included.
Costs that dated back before they were physically included amounting to over $30,000 were allowed even though I had no idea respondents were secretly consulting laywers.
No matter what I requested I was rubbished by Members and cttt staff, set up by cttt cicumstances and ended with a 28,000 debt for taking an unmerchantable motorhome to the CTTT.
Going to the CTTT has caused me to be bankrupt,
I am a centrelink pensioner who was given no grace help and support, was mistreated MISLED AND IGNORED.
ALL ADVERTISING DONE BY THE CTTT IS NOT THE FULL STORY A LIE MISLEADING AND I WOULD NOT HAVE GONE TO CTTT IF I KNEW THEN WHAT I KNEW NOW
THE CTTT ARE AN EXACT EXAMPLE OF FALSE AND MISLEADING SERVICES THAT DID NOT DELIVER WHAT WAS ADVERTISED ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIOR OF THE TRADE PRACTISES ACT.
THE CTTT IS GUILTY OF THE VERY BREECHS OF TRADE PRACTISES I WAS WANTING their help to be FIXED.
WHAT HOPE HAS A CITIZEN GOT.
IF YOU CANT AFFORD A LAWYER DONT GO TO THE CTTT.
i HAVE THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF LETTERS AND ALL CD'S AND CAN PROVE ALL THIS AND SO MUCH MORE.
I have used the public hearing as real justice evaded me but something needs to stop these meglamaniacs who have been given this power and have have abused it.
Post a Comment